AISCAISC 360-22
Commentary — Appendix 3 Fatigue

C-3.13.1 general provisions

PDF page 657 · AISC 360-22

This appendix deals with high-cycle fatigue (i.e., > 20,000 cycles); this behavior occurs when elastic stresses are involved. In situations where inelastic (plastic) stresses are involved, fatigue cracks may initiate at far fewer than 20,000 cyclesperhaps as few as a dozen. However, unlike the conditions prescribed in this appendix, low-cycle fatigue involves cyclic, inelastic stresses; this is because the applicable cyclic allowable stress range will be limited by the static allowable stress. At low levels of cyclic tensile stress, a point is reached where the stress range is so low that fatigue cracking will not initiate regardless of the number of cycles of loading. This level of stress is defined as the fatigue threshold, FTHF_{T H}.

Extensive test programs using full-size specimens, substantiated by theoretical stress analysis, have confirmed the following general conclusions (Fisher et al., 1970; Fisher et al., 1974):

  • (a) Stress range and notch severity are the dominant stress variables for welded details and beams.
  • (b) Other variables such as minimum stress, mean stress, and maximum stress are not significant for design purposes.
  • (c) Structural steels with a specified minimum yield stress of 36 to 100 ksi (250 to 690 MPa) do not exhibit significantly different fatigue strengths for given welded details fabricated in the same manner.

Fatigue crack growth rates are generally inversely proportional to the modulus of elasticity, and therefore, at higher temperatures, crack growth rates increase. At 500°F (260°C), crack growth rates on ASTM A212B steel (ASTM, 1967) are essen- tially the same as for room temperature (Hertzberg et al., 2012). The appendix is conservatively limited to applications involving temperatures not to exceed 300°F (150°C). Elevated temperature applications may also have corrosion effects that are not considered by the appendix.

The appendix does not have a lower temperature limit because fatigue crack growth rates are lower. Fatigue tests as low as −100°F (−75°C) have been conducted with no observed change in crack growth rates (Roberts et al., 1980). It should be recog- nized that at low temperatures, brittle fracture concerns increase. The critical size to which a crack can grow before the onset of brittle fracture will be smaller for low- temperature applications than will be the case for a room-temperature application.